Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick N. Smith, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Rosalie Hahn et al., Respondents, 1892 — 130 N.Y. 694 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick N. Smith, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Rosalie Hahn et al., Respondents
130 N.Y. 694·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick N. Smith, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Rosalie Hahn et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 20, 1892;
decided February 9, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
George A. Stearns for appellant.
James T. Olwell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.