Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Kiersted et al., Respondents, v. Harriet M. West et al., as Administrators, etc., Appellants, 1882 — 89 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
John H. Kiersted et al., Respondents, v. Harriet M. West et al., as Administrators, etc., Appellants
89 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1882·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Kiersted et al., Respondents, v. Harriet M. West et al., as Administrators, etc., Appellants.
(Argued April 24, 1882;
decided May 5, 1882.)
A. Taylor for appellants.
Arthv/r More for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
All concur, except Tract and Miller, JJ., absent.
Judgment affirmed.