Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DUNLAP, Iowa, et al., Appellants, v. HARRISON COUNTY, State of Iowa, et al., 1932 — 62 F.2d 1071 · caselaw · US
General
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DUNLAP, Iowa, et al., Appellants, v. HARRISON COUNTY, State of Iowa, et al.
62 F.2d 1071·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DUNLAP, Iowa, et al., Appellants, v. HARRISON COUNTY, State of Iowa, et al.
No. 9145.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Oct. 28, 1932.
H. L. Robertson and Paul E. Robertson, both of Council Bluffs, Iowa, for appellants.
William M. Tatum and Paul E.’ Roadifer, both of Logan, Iowa, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, with costs, per stipulation of parlies that case abide by decision of this court in ease of First National Bank of Woodbine, Iowa, et al., v. Harrison County, Iowa, et al., 57 F.(2d) 56.