General
Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1026·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P68/174.
protests 65/11684, 65/12596, and 65/18476 (New York).
Durst Industries, Inc. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Becicworti-i, J.]
Becicworti-i, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of hose nozzles in chief value of zinc similar in all material respects, except for composition, to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), and that the items marked “B” consist of shutoff connections, gooseneck connections, snap attachments, or Siamese shutoffs in chief value of zinc similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of said C.A.D. 859, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.