General
CAROLINA AMUSEMENT CO. et al. v. MARTIN, SHERIFF, et al.
367 U.S. 904·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CAROLINA AMUSEMENT CO. et al. v. MARTIN, SHERIFF, et al.
No. 424.
Decided June 19, 1961.
J. D. Todd, Jr. and Chester D. Ward, Jr. for appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.