Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles M. Preston, as Receiver of New York Building-Loan Banking Company, Respondent, v. Charles G. Reinhart et al., Appellants, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 555 · caselaw · US
General
Charles M. Preston, as Receiver of New York Building-Loan Banking Company, Respondent, v. Charles G. Reinhart et al., Appellants
185 N.Y. 555·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles M. Preston, as Receiver of New York Building-Loan Banking Company, Respondent, v. Charles G. Reinhart et al., Appellants.
Preston v. Reinhart, 109 App. Div. 781, affirmed.
(Argued April 26, 1906;
decided May 15, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 12,1906, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage.
William H. Hamilton for appellants.
Charles W. Dayton and Joseph E. Bullen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Preston v. Rockey (185 N. Y. 186).
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.