Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator, v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway; Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator, v. Portland Terminal Co., 1946 — 329 U.S. 696 · caselaw · US
General
Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator, v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway; Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator, v. Portland Terminal Co.
329 U.S. 696·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 335.
No. 336.
Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator, v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway. Walling, Wage & Hour Administrator, v. Portland Terminal Co.
October 14, 1946.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and
On petition for writ of certi-orari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
Solicitor General McGrath and William S. Tyson for petitioner.
Edwin F. Hunt, Walton Whitwell and Wm. H. Swiggart for respondent in No. 335.
Leonard A. Pierce and E. Spencer Miller for respondent in No. 336.
Harold B. Wahl filed a brief for the Jacksonville Terminal Co., as amicus curiae, opposing the petitions.
Reported below: No. 335,155 F. 2d 1016; No. 336,155 F. 2d 215.