Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Fleischmann, Respondent, v. Mendel Samuel et al., Appellants, 1897 — 154 N.Y. 731 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Fleischmann, Respondent, v. Mendel Samuel et al., Appellants
154 N.Y. 731·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Fleischmann, Respondent, v. Mendel Samuel et al., Appellants.
Fleischmann v. Samuel, 18 App. Div. 97, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 4, 1897;
decided October 12, 1897.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 19, 1897, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the decision of the Appellate Division that the verdict was supported by the evidence was unanimous, and that no questions of law are raised by appellants’ exceptions which can be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.
M. Hallheimer for motion.
Herman Stiefel opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.