General
Pauline Calak, Appellant, v. N. A. Posner, Defendant, and Samuel Rubin, Respondent
250 A.D. 867·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Pauline Calak, Appellant, v. N. A. Posner, Defendant, and Samuel Rubin, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order dismissing the complaint for lack of prosecution, and the judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied, and the ease ordered on the May term calendar for trial. The facts disclosed in the record indicate that the plaintiff should not be denied her day in court because of the neglect of her attorney. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes for affirmance, being of opinion that it cannot be said that the court’s exercise of discretion was improper.