Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ROTARY PRESS, INC., Respondent, 1975 — 524 F.2d 1342 · caselaw · US
General
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ROTARY PRESS, INC., Respondent
524 F.2d 1342·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1975
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ROTARY PRESS, INC., Respondent.
No. 75-1164.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 5, 1975.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N. L. R. B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.
Arnold Morelli, Bauer, Morelli & Heyd, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
It appearing that on April 24, 1975, this Court filed an order directing the respondent to show cause why the petitioner’s motion for judgment by default should not be granted, and it further appearing that to date the respondent has not responded thereto,
It is ordered that the petitioner’s motion for judgment by default be and it hereby is granted and the Board’s order is hereby enforced.