General

Companhia Atlantica de Desenvolvimento E Exploracao de Minas v. United States; and United States v. Companhia Atlantica de Desenvolvimento E Exploracao de Minas

364 U.S. 862·Supreme Court of the United States·1960

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 209. Companhia Atlantica de Desenvolvimento E Exploracao de Minas v. United States; and United States v. Companhia Atlantica de Desenvolvimento E Exploracao de Minas. No. 383. Francis A. Brick, Jr. for petitioner in No. 209 and respondent in No. 383. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander and Herbert E. Morris for the United States. Joel W. Westbrook, James M. Landis and Philip J. O’Brien, Jr. filed a brief for Westbrook et al., as amici curiae, in support of petitioner in No. 209. [MAJORITY] Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Reported below:-Ct. Cl.-, 180 F. Supp. 342.