Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Village of Mechanicville, Respondent, v. Stillwater and Mechanicville Street Railway Company, Appellant, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 507 · caselaw · US
General
Village of Mechanicville, Respondent, v. Stillwater and Mechanicville Street Railway Company, Appellant
174 N.Y. 507·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Village of Mechanicville, Respondent, v. Stillwater and Mechanicville Street Railway Company, Appellant.
Village of Mechanicville v. Stillwater & M. St. By. Go., 67 App. Div. 628, affirmed.
(Argued February 18, 1903;
decided March 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 9, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Joseph A. Kellogg and Thomas <9’ Connor for appellant.
JD. A. Lockwood for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Cullen, JJ.