General
Schmidt et al. v. United States et al.; and Northern Pacific Railroad Co., by Schmidt et al. v. Same
308 U.S. 569·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 116.
No. 117.
Schmidt et al. v. United States et al.; and Northern Pacific Railroad Co., by Schmidt et al. v. Same.
October 9, 1939.
Messrs. Thomas Boylan, Robert L. Edmiston, Raymond M. Hudson, Minor Hudson, and Geoffrey Creyke, Jr. for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Bell, Assistant Attorney General Littell, and Messrs. E. E. Danly, Walter L. Pope, and ■ Warner W. Gardner for the United States. Messrs. Lorenzo P daPonte, Grandin Tracy Vought, Alfred N. Heuston, and John B. Marsh for Northern Pacific Ry. Co. et al», respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Reported below: 102 F. 2d 589.