Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Boteler, Trustee, v. Ingels, Director of Motor Vehicles of California, et al., 1939 — 307 U.S. 617 · caselaw · US
General
Boteler, Trustee, v. Ingels, Director of Motor Vehicles of California, et al.
307 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 745 and 746.
Boteler, Trustee, v. Ingels, Director of Motor Vehicles of California, et al.
April 24, 1939.
Mr. Thomas S. Tobin for petitioner. Messrs. Earl Warren and Frank W. Richards for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.