Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alonzo E. De Baun, Respondent, v. Stuart H. Moore, Appellant, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 598 · caselaw · US
General
Alonzo E. De Baun, Respondent, v. Stuart H. Moore, Appellant
167 N.Y. 598·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alonzo E. De Baun, Respondent, v. Stuart H. Moore, Appellant.
(Argued April 26, 1901;
decided June 4, 1901.)
De Baun v. Moore, 32 App. Div. 397, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division, of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 13, 1898, in favor of plaintiff upon the submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts under sections 1279-1281 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Leslie M. Daniel for appellant.
Wheeler H. Peckham for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.