Corporations

In the Matter of the Claim of Fred Ball, Respondent, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Appellants, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Respondent. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

43 A.D.2d 606·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1973·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Claim of Fred Ball, Respondent, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Appellants, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. [MAJORITY] Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 23, 1972 and its amended decision of October 17, 1972, winch affirmed the Referee’s discharge of the Special Fund for Reopened Cases. Decision affirmed, with costs to Special Fund for Reopened Cases (see Matter of Schwartz v. Tour Baking Go., 20 A D 2d 422). Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.