Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Litey E. Maxon et al., Appellants, v. Esther M. Maxon et al., Respondents, 1873 — 52 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Litey E. Maxon et al., Appellants, v. Esther M. Maxon et al., Respondents
52 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Litey E. Maxon et al., Appellants, v. Esther M. Maxon et al., Respondents.
(Submitted January 24, 1873;
decided January, 28, 1873.)
This was an appeal from judgment of the General Term in the fourth department, affirming decree of surrogate admitting to probate the last will and testament of Lyman TT- Maxon, deceased. The principal question was as to whether the will was duly published as required by the statute. Decided upon the facts in the case.
Moore ds MeOartm for the appellants.
Milton H. Merwim, for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Grover, J.,]
Grover, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.