Criminal Law · MBE-tested
FRANK M. SNEE, alias FRANCISCO VALENZUELA, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
18 Ariz. 338159 Pac. 514·Arizona Supreme Court·1916·AZ
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Criminal No. 415.
Filed October 17, 1916.]
[159 Pac. 514.]
FRANK M. SNEE, alias FRANCISCO VALENZUELA, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. Frank Baxter, Judge.
Affirmed.
Messrs. Timmons & Harris, for Appellant.
Mr. Wiley E. Jones, Attorney General, Mr. Clement H. Colman, County Attorney, and Mr. T. D. Molloy, Deputy County Attorney, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — FRANKLIN, J.]
FRANKLIN, J.
Appellant has taken an appeal and on June 12, 1916,' caused to be filed in this court a transcript of “the record of his conviction of the crime of grand larceny. No effort has been made to show any legal reason for reversing the judgment of the trial court. We have carefully examined the record presented, which clearly shows appellant’s ■guilt of the offense charged, and that his substantial rights have been guarded in a fair and impartial trial.
The judgment is affirmed.
ROSS, C. J., and CUNNINGHAM, J., concur.