Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry E. P. Sutton, Appellant, v. George T. M. Davis, Executor, etc., Respondent, 1876 — 64 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
General
Henry E. P. Sutton, Appellant, v. George T. M. Davis, Executor, etc., Respondent
64 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry E. P. Sutton, Appellant, v. George T. M. Davis, Executor, etc., Respondent.
(Argued February 1, 1876;
decided February 8, 1876.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion on the part of plaintiff to attach defendant for alleged contempt.
The alleged contempt was in the neglect to obey a decree herein requiring defendant to pay over to plaintiff a certain portion of the estate in his hands, and a certain sum for funeral expenses paid. The motion was denied, for the reason that the amount defendant was to pay over, was not specifically or definitely stated, and for the purpose of ascertaining the amount an accounting was directed. Held, that the order, both that portion refusing to punish for the alleged contempt and that directing a reference, was within the discretion of the court, and so not re viewable here; that the latter portion was not a vacation or modification of the decree.
A. J. Requier for the appellant.
Moses Ely for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
opinion for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.