General
Milton C. Wright et al., Respondents, v. George Brooks, Appellant, and Second National Bank of Cooperstown et al., Respondents
191 N.Y. 531·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Milton C. Wright et al., Respondents, v. George Brooks, Appellant, and Second National Bank of Cooperstown et al., Respondents.
Wright v. BrooJes, 116 App. Div. 921, affirmed.
(Argued February 21, 1908;
decided March 10, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 18, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, as against the defendant, appellant, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover moneys alleged to have been obtained by fraud.
A. R. Gibbs for appellant.
Lynn J. Arnold for plaintiffs, respondents.
James W. Barnum for defendants, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Co'ncur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.