Property · MBE-tested
Canfield and Losey against Lindley
4 Cow. 532·New York Supreme Court·1825·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Canfield and Losey against Lindley.
Thai witnesses reside in a neighboring state, near the place where the venue is reason forget tabling it.
In covenant, J. Dickson moved to change the venue from the city of Now York to the county of Monroo, on an affidavit stating the residence of throe material witnesses • ,, „ -i ,4.___„,,,„4.„ ln the latter COUllty.
Cr. Bronson, contra,
opposed this on the plaintiff’s affidavit that he had one witness'in the city of New York, and three in the state of New Jersey near the city of New York, whose attendance he expected to procure at the Circuit ; But,
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
We do not remember its ever having been held, that the fact of witnesses’ residing in a neighboring state is to weigh with us in fixing the venue. A commission may yet be necessary to examino them.
Motion granted