General
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. H. D. SUHR, Appellant
25 Cal. App. 805·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1914·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 254.
Third Appellate District.
September 10, 1914.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. H. D. SUHR, Appellant.
Cbiminal Law—Homicide.—Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed on the authority of People v. Ford, ante, p. 388.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County and from an order refusing a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in People v. Ford, ante, p. 388.
R. W. Royce, and Austin Lewis, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
It was stipulated that Crim. No. 253, People v. Ford, and Crim. No. 254, People v. Suhr, should be tried together and that the appeals in both eases should be heard on the record brought up in Crim. No. 253, People v. Ford. The law and the facts in both cases have been fully considered in People v. Ford, ante, p. 388, [143 Pac. 1075], this day decided.
Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons therein given,
The judgment and order are affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 9, 1914.