General
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
386 U.S. 8·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 715.
Decided February 13, 1967.
A. Alvis Layne for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al.; Richard A. Hollander for Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.; and Thomas C. Britton and St. Julien P. Rosemond for Dade County et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of Dade County et al. to join Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company in its motion to affirm is. granted.
The motions to affirm are granted and thé judgment is affirmed.