General
Nathan Newman v. United States
18 Cust. Ct. 319·United States Customs Court·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nathan Newman v. United States
No. 6776.
Entry No. 716558/2, etc.
Invoices dated Sheffield, England, August 23, 1945, etc.
Certified September 17, 1945, etc.
Entered at New York, N. Y., October 17, 1945, etc.
(Decided January 17, 1947)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
• Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Lawrence, Judge:]
Lawrence, Judge:
It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-me'ntioned merchandise are the same, in all material respects as those decided in United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.
Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.