General
James Caraher, as Administrator, etc., et al., Respondents, v. The Royal Insurance Company et al., Appellants
136 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Caraher, as Administrator, etc., et al., Respondents, v. The Royal Insurance Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 1, 1892;
decided December 20, 1892.)
Appeal from judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon orders made February 2, 1892, which affirmed judgments in favor of the plaintiffs entered upon reports of a referee.
-4. F. Sawyer and I M. Ames for appellants.
William Fernán, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., talcing no part.
Judgments affirmed.