Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. et al. v. CITY OF KENOSHA, 1958 — 356 U.S. 21 · caselaw · US
Corporations
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. et al. v. CITY OF KENOSHA
356 U.S. 212 L. Ed. 2d 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U. S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. et al. v. CITY OF KENOSHA.
No. 343.
Decided March 10, 1958.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants.
Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U. S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.