Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jamal KNOX, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 1547 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Jamal KNOX, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.
139 S. Ct. 1547·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jamal KNOX, petitioner,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 18-949.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 15, 2019.
Motion of Michael Render, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Cato Institute, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Art Scholars and Historians for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.