General
Louis Freudenberg and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Freudenberg & Mattuck, Respondents, v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc., and Another, Appellants
245 A.D. 725·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Freudenberg and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Freudenberg & Mattuck, Respondents, v. Rainbow Luminous Products, Inc., and Another, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying defendants’ motion to require the county clerk of Kings county to receive and enter a judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Water Right & Electrical Co., Inc., v. Rockland Light & Power Co. [post, p. 739], decided herewith.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.