General
CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES
384 U.S. 88616 L. Ed. 2d 993·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Black concurs in the result. · Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES.
No. 33.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 33. Philip R. Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 218.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States in No. 33. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 218.
Together with No. 218, Tramunti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings in the light of Shillitani v. United States, ante, p. 364.
Mr. Justice Black concurs in the result.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.