Criminal Law · MBE-tested
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. YAK Q. GINE, Appellant
28 Cal. App. 801·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1915·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 548.
First Appellate District.
July 21, 1915.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. YAK Q. GINE, Appellant.
Criminal Law—Violation op Medical Act—Constitutional Law.— Judgment of conviction and order refusing a new trial affirmed on ■the authority of People v. Tom J. Chong, ante, p. 121.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in People v. Tom J. Chong, ante, p. 121, [151 Pac. 553].
Michelsen & Michelsen, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Louis H. Ward, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
The defendant was charged with violating section 17 of chapter 354 of the statutes of 1913, relating to the practice of medicine and surgery. He was convicted, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The questions raised upon the appeal are identical with those presented in the case of the People v. Tom J. Chong, (Crim. No. 549), ante, p. 121, [151 Pac. 553], this day decided, and the decision of those questions as arrived at in that ease will apply to this. For the reasons stated for the affirmance of the judgment and order in said case (Crim. No. 549) the judgment and order herein are affirmed.