Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WONG CHING HUN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WONG TOONG SUNG, also Known as Thomas Sen, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. SHING AH SHIN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. CHONG AH SHING, Appellant, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WONG CHING HUN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WONG TOONG SUNG, also Known as Thomas Sen, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. SHING AH SHIN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. CHONG AH SHING, Appellant
65 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WONG CHING HUN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WONG TOONG SUNG, also Known as Thomas Sen, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. SHING AH SHIN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. CHONG AH SHING, Appellant.
Nos. 470-473.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 27, 1933.
Louis Seadron, of New York City, for appellants.
George Z. Medalie, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Bronson Goddard, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgments affirmed on the authority of Mon Dot v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 711; Wong Hop v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 596.