Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, et al., 1966 — 383 U.S. 271 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, et al.
383 U.S. 271·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CRAWFORD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, et al.
No. 941.
Decided February 28, 1966.
Fines F. Batchelor, Jr., for appellant in No. 941. W. B. Brady for appellant in No. 942.
Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, F-arrell E. Faubus, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack L. Lessenberry for appellees in both cases.
Together with No. 942, Alexander v. Faubus, Governor of Arkansas, et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.