Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David Davidson, Respondent, v. Cannabis Manufacturing Company, Appellant, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 576 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
David Davidson, Respondent, v. Cannabis Manufacturing Company, Appellant
187 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Davidson, Respondent, v. Cannabis Manufacturing Company, Appellant.
Davidson v. Cannabis Manuf. Co., 113 App. Div. 664, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted February 18, 1907;
decided February 26, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 21,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property.
The motion was made upon the ground that by reason of the unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division no question was presented which the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review.
Benjamin F. Feiner for motion.
Hector M. Hitchings opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.