Contracts · MBE-tested
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sugar Daddy, Inc., et al.; and Weinberg et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
392 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1364.
No. 1389.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sugar Daddy, Inc., et al.; and Weinberg et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Solicitor General Grisiuold for petitioner in No. 1364.
Ernest George Williams for petitioners, and Mr. Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Gilbert E. Andrews, and Louis M. Kauder for respondent in No. 1389.
[MAJORITY]
C, A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 386 F. 2d 836.