Torts · MBE-tested
CARAMELLI v. UNITED STATES
281 F. 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1922
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CARAMELLI v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 30, 1922.)
No. 2997.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Suit by the United States against Charles Caramelli. From the decree, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
John T. Duffy, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Chas. F. Clyne and C. W. Middlekauff, both of Chicago, 111., for the United States.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal is taken from a decree closing premises owned and occupied by appellant and enjoining the further maintenance of a nuisance thereon, all pursuant to section 22, title 2, National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 314). No assignment of error is presented that has not been decided adversely to appellant in one or more of the many similar cases we have decided during the last few months. The record has also been examined to ascertain whether the evidence supports the decree. Satisfied that it does, we find no reversible error. The decree is affirmed.