Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The State of Rhode Island, complainant v. The State of Massachusetts, 1833 — 32 U.S. 651 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
The State of Rhode Island, complainant v. The State of Massachusetts
32 U.S. 6517 Pet. 651·Supreme Court of the United States·1833
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The State of Rhode Island, complainant v. The State of Massachusetts.
MR ROBBINS,'solicitor for the complainant, having renewed his motion of last term in this case, prayed the court to award such process, and in such form, as the court may deem proper
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the motion made in this case, it is now here ordered by the court tnat process of subpoena be, and the same is hereby awarded as prayed for by the complainant, and that said process issue against “ The commonwealth of Massachusetts.”