Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joshua C. Sanders, Appellant and Respondent, v. William A. Carley et al., Respondents and Appellants, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
General
Joshua C. Sanders, Appellant and Respondent, v. William A. Carley et al., Respondents and Appellants
178 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joshua C. Sanders, Appellant and Respondent, v. William A. Carley et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Sanders v. Garley, 83 App. Div. 193, affirmed.
(Submitted May 5, 1904;
decided May 20, 1904.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 4, 1903, affirming a judgment of a Trial Term determining the ownership of a certain plot of land in the borough of Brooklyn.
Robert CfoeTler and Joseph LL. Mahcm for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.
James A. Sheehan, Stephen M. LLoye and Edward L. Somerville for defendants, respondents and appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, without costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Cullen, JJ.