General

Greater New York Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Chaim Feder et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

224 A.D.2d 661638 N.Y.S.2d 918·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1996·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Greater New York Savings Bank, Respondent, v Chaim Feder et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. [638 NYS2d 918] [MAJORITY] —In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Chaim Feder and Bayla Feder appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated November 14, 1994, as denied their motion to vacate the judgment of foreclosure. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The appellants failed to demonstrate grounds for relieving them of the judgment of foreclosure (see, CPLR 5015 [a]). The appellants failed to redeem the mortgage at issue though given numerous opportunities to do so. We note that the stay of enforcement of the judgment was vacated by decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 17, 1996. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.