Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Hunt Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission; Scott et al. v. Union Producing Co. et al.; Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc., v. Federal Power Commission; Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Federal Power Commission; United States v. Grand River Dam Authority; Hannah et al. v. Larche et al.; Hannah et al. v. Slawson et al.; Ginsburg v. Gourley, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court; Kicak v. Ohio; Olshausen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Kreshik et al. v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church of North America; Bernstein et al. v. Real Estate Commission of Maryland et al.; Livingston et al. v. United States et al.; Quirke v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. et al., 1960 — 364 U.S. 855 · caselaw · US