Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 1973 — 412 U.S. 945 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
International Business Machines Corp. v. United States
412 U.S. 945·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-1206 (72-1173).
International Business Machines Corp. v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
Application for stay of execution and enforcement of pretrial order No. 5 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and for a stay of mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the application.