Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Riley, Labor Commissioner, et al. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local Union No. 633, et al., 1949 — 336 U.S. 930 · caselaw · US
General
Riley, Labor Commissioner, et al. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local Union No. 633, et al.
336 U.S. 930·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 283.
Riley, Labor Commissioner, et al. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local Union No. 633, et al.
Ernest R. D’Amours, Attorney General of New Hampshire, for petitioners. H. Thornton Lorimer for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. It appearing that the cause has become moot, the judgment of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire is vacated without costs and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that Court may be deemed appropriate.