Contracts · MBE-tested

Uvalde Asphalt Paving Company, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Defendant, Impleaded with Joseph Sigretto and James Mannino, Composing the Firm of Sigretto & Mannino, Appellants

113 A.D. 916·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1906·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Uvalde Asphalt Paving Company, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Defendant, Impleaded with Joseph Sigretto and James Mannino, Composing the Firm of Sigretto & Mannino, Appellants. [MAJORITY] We find the fact to be that the individual' defendants have always refused to assign to the plaintiff the contract mentioned in the 5th finding of fact, Or to give orders for or assignments of the moneys due from the comptroller under that -contract. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Hooker and Rich, JJ.-, concurred.