Corporations
Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corporation, Respondent, v. Nicholas Sechko, Appellant, and Nicholas Avraloff (Also Known as Nicholas Nagrodsky), Respondent. R. Mudano and Smith Alford & Co., Inc., Defendants
227 A.D. 668·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hempstead Harbor Lumber Corporation, Respondent, v. Nicholas Sechko, Appellant, and Nicholas Avraloff (Also Known as Nicholas Nagrodsky), Respondent. R. Mudano and Smith Alford & Co., Inc., Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Order of the County Court of Nassau county denying motion of defendant Nicholas Sechko to dismiss complaint and to vacate undertaking affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mr. Hyman Bushel, the attorney who appeared in the action for defendant Sechko and served said defendant’s answer, was appointed a city magistrate. No other attorney has been substituted. No action can be taken until there is a substitution of attorneys. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 240.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.