Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Kiefer, as Administratrix of Joseph Kiefer, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 688 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Kiefer, as Administratrix of Joseph Kiefer, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent
153 N.Y. 688·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Kiefer, as Administratrix of Joseph Kiefer, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent.
Kiefer v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 12 App. Div. 28, affirmed.
(Argued June 23, 1897;
decided October 5, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 24,1896, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to resettle a judgment.
J. IF. Bussell for appellant.
AdeTbert Moot and George F. Brownell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.