General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Prince, James Brown, Joseph Henry Ratti and Daniel Newsome, Appellants
31 A.D.2d 905·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1969·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Prince, James Brown, Joseph Henry Ratti and Daniel Newsome, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments of conviction unanimously affirmed. We are satisfied that on the record, the defendants were properly found guilty. Under the circumstances of this case the use of the photograph for identification was not prejudicial error. '.Concur —■ Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Nunez and -Steuer, JJ.