Torts · MBE-tested
William A. Wodowski, Appellant, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Defendants, and Dale Marshall, Respondent
120 A.D.2d 960·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1986·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William A. Wodowski, Appellant, v Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Defendants, and Dale Marshall, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Same memorandum as in Wodowski v Consolidated Rail Corp. ([Appeal No. 1], 120 AD2d 959). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kuszynski, J. — negligence.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.