Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Alfred R. Goslin, Respondent, to Punish H. James Alexander, Appellant, and Another, for Contempt, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 505 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Alfred R. Goslin, Respondent, to Punish H. James Alexander, Appellant, and Another, for Contempt
180 N.Y. 505·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Alfred R. Goslin, Respondent, to Punish H. James Alexander, Appellant, and Another, for Contempt.
Matter of Goslin, 95 App, Div. 407, affirmed.
(Argued November 16, 1904;
decided December 6, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 23, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term adjudging the appellant herein guilty of contempt of court and punishing him therefor.
Isaac I. Miller for appellant.
William J. lippmann for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.