Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY, a Corporation v. UNITED STATES of America, 1930 — 41 F.2d 991 · caselaw · US
Corporations
COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY, a Corporation v. UNITED STATES of America
41 F.2d 991·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY, a Corporation v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 5970.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 16, 1930.
Charles W. Haswell, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Samuel W. MeNahh, U. S. Atty., and Harry Graham Balter, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A federal prohibition agent, having discovered a person in the act of transporting intoxicating liquor in an automobile, in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) seized the automobile and arrested the driver. Later, the driver was prosecuted under the revenue laws, and a judgment was entered, in a separate proceeding, forfeiting the automobile under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 1181), as in Davies Motors, Inc., v. United States (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 928. From the judgment of forfeiture, the present appeal is prosecuted.
The judgment is reversed on the authority of Davies Motors, Inc., v. United States, 50 S. Ct. 385, 74 L. Ed. 1016, decided by the Supreme Court May 19, 1930.