Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Witherspoon v. Illinois et al.; Bumper v. North Carolina, 1968 — 390 U.S. 1001 · caselaw · US
General
Witherspoon v. Illinois et al.; Bumper v. North Carolina
390 U.S. 1001·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1015.
No. 1016.
Witherspoon v. Illinois et al. Bumper v. North Carolina.
Joel W. Westbrook for Turner; John P. Frank and John J. Flynn for Madden; Alex Elson, Willard J. Lassers and Marvin Braiterman for American Friends Service Committee et al.; and Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner, Leroy D. Clark, Norman C. Amaker, Charles S. Ralston and Anthony G. Amsterdam for NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., et al., on the motions.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Ill.; and
Sup. Ct. N. C. Motions of Oscar Turner, Rebecca B. Madden, and American Friends Service Committee et al. for leave to file briefs, as amici curiae, in No. 1015, granted. Motion of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., et al., for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, in both cases, granted.
[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 986.]