Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Steamship Bowdoin Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California et al., 1918 — 246 U.S. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Steamship Bowdoin Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California et al.
246 U.S. 648·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 476.
Steamship Bowdoin Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Argued January 21, 1918.
Decided March 4, 1918.
Mr. Edward J. McCutchen and Mr. Ira A. Campbell for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Christopher M. Bradley for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed upon the authority of Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205; Clyde Steamship Co. v. Walker, 244 U. S. 255.